@adbenitez I would recommend writing to tech news outlets so that they cover Delta Chat. One of the deleted drafts about Delta Chat is mine- I actually share their rejection.
I would recommend focusing on getting the tech press covering Delta Chat- that would actually have a bigger effect on Delta Chat adoption (more reach), and then the Wikipedia article would come for free.
some links:
- https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/31/world/europe/russia-internet-restrictions.html (mentions Delta Chat)
- https://www.heise.de/ratgeber/Per-E-Mail-chatten-Delta-Chat-als-Messenger-und-Mailsoftware-nutzen-9432335.html (germans most trusted tech publication)
- https://www.opentech.fund/projects-we-support/supported-projects/delta-chat/
- https://salazar.house.gov/media/press-releases/salazar-announces-new-app-allow-cuban-protestors-bypass-censorship-third (only for relevance, (most) things that politician said are incorrect)
- https://en.reset.org/decentralised-efficient-without-being-addictive-delta-chat-is-our-favourite-instant-messenger/
- https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/technik-der-messenger-der-e-mail-nutzt-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-190819-99-523367 (german, from dpa)
There are many more links. While I personally agree that there could be more articles, there are already quite some already that mention the project.
@treefit @yo @adbenitez I think the Heise article is why German Wikipedia has an entry ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Chat ). How famous is reset.org? The NY Times article seems too tangential to justify an entry.
My understanding is that if a "well-known" publication published an article on Delta Chat, English Wikipedia would not refuse an entry about it.
