@yo Yes, I did doubt it.
My impression was that accessibility was too specialised and too expensive to introduce in many projects and that was the reason it wasn't done.
Edit: Not saying it I thought it was impossible, but I thought it was meaningfully difficult to the point that it made prioritising it compared to other features a genuinely difficult allocation question.
If the assumption that LLMs do not make coding significantly easier, faster, or cheaper actually holds, then this cannot be the reason, because lots of accessibility is being solved now that wasn't earlier.
I'm sure that many non-coder decision-makers also prioritise accessibility last, if they even know about it.
But I'm not at all convinced they make things materially worse than they otherwise would be, given the general state of dev-led projects.
There's even an argument, though one would need to put numbers to it, that a lot of the projects which introduce meaningful accessibility do so under non-coder decision.
, fuck all GenAI